| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Creating a list of subsets
Post: The problem is that even small
operations add up when they are done to 2^35
subsets. I rewrote a large chunk of code so that
the...
 | 2007-04-05 11:38:50 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Creating a list of subsets
Post: Actually, I think I'll use the binary
string idea. If I do it correctly, I might be able
to speed up a more cpu-intensive portio...
| 2007-04-02 20:06:24 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Creating a list of subsets
Post: Thanks for the replies.
Recursion was what I saw at first, but I'd be
dealing with sets with at least 35 elements. In my
(lim...
| 2007-04-02 18:23:08 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Creating a list of subsets
Post: What is the best way to make a
powerset of a set?
A powerset of a set is the set of all subsets of
that set.
Example:
The...
| 2007-04-01 16:44:14 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: challenge level 1..
Post: Try looking at it in a simpler way.
| 2007-03-04 21:18:24 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Reverser 1
Post: Pathetic as it is, I can't beat the
first reverser. I don't program Assembly, but I
have learned the basics. I scanned through ...
| 2005-06-13 15:28:24 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Quad Trees
Post: After looking at the challenge for a
while, I came up with a nice idea, and worked it
out. When I tried to get the darn thing t...
| 2005-06-05 16:36:17 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Skyline Geek Challenge
Post: 13753087 is the final checksum of the
first example, with the triples. This question
has been asked several times. Maybe it sh...
| 2005-06-02 00:57:31 |
| Forums | Author: sRand_black
Title: Re: Bonus: Brute Force
Post:
perl brute forcing the hash took me about 5
minutes ...
deckkeeper what's ur language ?
| 2005-05-23 21:04:12 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Bonus: Brute Force
Post: I did the whole thing even faster
than that. If you do it right, it's easy.
| 2005-05-23 20:25:14 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Mersenne Twister - Valid
Example?
Post: Nevermind. Completely ignore what I
said. My script works perfectly. I was thinking
too hard.
| 2005-05-22 16:56:54 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Mersenne Twister - Valid
Example?
Post: I'm so confused right now. I thought
the result was a list of 13 numbers. I don't know
C++, or whatever language the function ...
| 2005-05-21 18:00:40 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Mersenne Twister - Valid
Example?
Post: Your result is 10 digit long instead
of 13. Is that a mistake?
| 2005-05-21 03:02:34 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Mersenne Twister - Valid
Example?
Post: I could use one too.
| 2005-05-20 00:19:24 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Level 7 (wrong example?)
Post: Nevermind! I've solved it! I'm
annoyed because I wasted 15 points on a hint that
told me what I already knew, and then figured...
| 2005-05-19 00:35:10 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Level 7 (wrong example?)
Post: Also, when you shift the bits, do
they loop around, or do they just dissapear, and
have zeros put in the front?
| 2005-05-18 21:36:07 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Level 1
Post: Trust me, this is easy. You're
thinking too hard.
| 2005-05-18 20:20:36 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Level 7 (wrong example?)
Post: I've got a problem with this one too.
It says that the new checksum,
00011111101011010101100010010110, is 13753087, but
I think...
| 2005-05-17 23:27:28 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Bonus 9: Basic Cryptography
Post: I got it. What bugs me is that my
program was working perfectly, I just forgot a
step. Oh, well.
| 2005-05-03 21:01:38 |
| Forums | Author: deckkeeper
Title: Re: Bonus 9: Basic Cryptography
Post: Padded!? Oh no... :[. I'd been
working under the assumption that it wasn't padded
at all...Well, believe it or not, what you sa...
| 2005-05-03 20:31:03 |
Copyright Open Source Institute, 2006 
