|
 |
Articles |
|
|
|
 |
GEEK |
|
|
|
 |
User's box |
|
|
|
 |
Shoutbox |
| MaxMouse It's
Friday...
That's good
enough for
me! |
| CodeX non stop
lolz here
but thats
soon to end
thanks to
uni, surely
the rest of
the world is
going good? |
| stabat how things
are going
guys?
Here...
boring... |
| CodeX I must be
going wrong
on the
password
lengths
then, as
long as it
was done on
ECB |
| MaxMouse lol... the
key is in
hex (MD5: of
the string
"doit"
without the
"'s) and is
in lower
case. Maybe
i should
have
submitted
this as a
challenge! |
|
|
 |
Donate |
|
Donate and help us fund new challenges
|
|
|
|
Due Date:
|
May 31 |
|
May Goal:
|
$40.00
|
|
Gross:
|
$0.00 |
|
Net Balance:
|
$0.00 |
|
Left to go:
|
$40.00 |
|
|
|
 |
News Feeds |
|
|
|
|
 |
Nightscript's Blog |
1
by Nightscript on Fri 19th Dec 5am
Yes i'm crazy but heres what ive been thinking about and it seems more reasonable that a lot of reality. Note that this ties into parapsychology/psychokinesis research.
Mind is not over matter. Thats the wrong state of thinking for sure.
Look, this is how i think i see it now, im enlightened or ignorant but such is the world. Every time.
The thing ive come across is that when we think it is Mind over matter we are convinced that we can directly influence an object or anything else. Thats because we figure that our Mind is stronger than anything we might put it up against. On a previous article i've written, I said that we would need to find out where the Mind interacts with our brain in order to initiate action.
ok gang here comes.
Its true what i said earlier..our Mind is most definitely NOT [over] matter. And since we dont really have any method scientifically to find the Mind itself can we not say that Mind IS matter? Yes we can, because if you will also think back to my discussion of Mind and conciousness, i said that we each exist in Our world and that everything can seemingly be based around us. Though most folks interact to some degree with things that will never have anything to do with them, the world I speak of is the one you live in, walk and talk through each day. So our Mind is everything that our world or our personal universe is made of. Mind is Matter.
With the fact or idea (whichever you prefer) that Mind is Matter, (not the literal sense, like..grey matter...idiot.) um with that idea...we have a seeming location of the Mind. We can say my mind is located in everything around me, it makes up every aspect of the world I personally live in, and my thoughts, my reactions, anything that must be initiated by energy from my Mind comes from my environment and surrounding things. Everything I see, everything I interact with from day to day, everything I come into any form of contact with contributes to my Mind because it will flow through thought. Therefore, once again, Mind is matter. Mind is composed of my personal world.
We have a location for Mind now people. Now where oh where would we consider an interaction point for the energies of Mind to be converted into reactions and movements? Our body itself MUST be the interaction point of Mind. Not only is it our brain, but since a stimulus has to occur to our body, (message then goes to brain to create an effect on our senses) it has to be our whole body. Our brain only tells us where the message is coming from and it also does things like reflex...Go ahead and think of your brain as being solely responsible for involuntary action. Mind guides our actions through thought. The initial energy that is put into actions with any form of thought behind it (this means exclude reflex) lets us see rather plainly, or not if youre blind, that Mind is connected to the world through our body.
So we know where we can possibly find our Mind, and we know now that its connected to the corporeal world through our body. When we commit action with the Mind, such as the entire goal of my research happens to be, we are basically forced to use our body to carry it out. This is a plain fact of life. So now the only thing that remains to be discovered is the way or method to take our Mind's interaction with the body and move it directly to what we wish to influence. To take the energy that we can call thought or want to...and instead of having to use any tools..such as our body...use the raw energy directly.
With the discovery (of sorts) of where Mind is, and where the interaction point is...we can move to the final step and are well on the way to experimentation.
Now I'd like to revisit something from earlier and maybe (expect recovering of some areas) elaborate on a couple things.. First. I have a suspicion that our brain is responsible for nothing more than involuntary actions. Hear me out guys. Nothing you do is voluntary by the body. Which means all of your muscles that move when you decide for them to move...are being forced to. Involuntary action, on their part..because you want it to happen.
I know that seems a little bit hard to grasp but here goes: You as a person are not held within your brain. Your Mind holds your personality and all your traits/flaws. So its partially safe to say that upon removal of Mind from the body..that the body cannot be called - You. right? Since your Mind exists in all things that make up your personal world, we can go deeper insomuch as to say that it is, in fact, not part of the body. Which also explains the need for an interaction point (the body) to the world. Are we all still on the same page here?
So every interaction that begins in the Mind...which is anything non-reflexive or voluntary...forces the body to commit what the action dictates. If you wish to go running, then the action is initiated in the Mind. "I THINK I'll go for a run." As you run the corporeal body will fatigue and want to stop...but you press on for the sake of exercise, you force the body to continue through willpower/thought. Tell me how the brain is involved in that in any voluntary action?
The only thing it has done in this (or most any) instance is send the signals to tell the muscles how to do the action you want. Running is created in a sort of chain reaction. You spark the idea with Mind. The energy is carried to the tools (brain), which, in turn signals secondary tools (muscles) to begin working. Do you still understand?
Comments (helpful ones) are welcome. Ill add more to this later on.
-NS
by Nightscript on Tue 1st Jul 7am
I guess...since so few people read anyway, im just writing these things so i dont forget them
Gang lets talk about the Greed of... i dunno, absolutely everything
Let it be known that nothing escapes Greed.
Everything is self purposed on some level.
[hell remind me to do one 'everything is everything..on some level']
Whats greed anyway?
My personal opinion is just that thing what drives people to further their own goals. And thats a pretty general statement considering Greed is supposed to be terrible. And i guess in the way it is used against us in the media...it is a monster.
But lets stop and figure out how such a terrible thing has infiltrated...no..always always been a part of existance. How can we live with that? Rather...how can decent people live with such an idea? Shouldn't conscience or some other dumb thing get in the way?
No, i dont think it would. Greed is a part of humanity...but not an evil part. Greed is just like i said...that drive for goals.
Greed is in every single thing these days...and its certainly the bad kind. Greed lies at the foundation of our very universe...nothing is left untouched, not even religion.
Everything anywhere is fueled by greed.
Our world will continue to thrive upon itself through greed....mainly the bad forms considering how times look now. There will never cease to be something to sell, somewhere to climb to, some other thing that, provided you can push your limits, is on the edge of reach. Fuel for the world...much like our vehicles. While its true the fossil fuels will burn out, alternatives are being made.
So lets look at that analogy:
The fossil fuels of greed are burning out and alternatives are being made.
On a similar note lets take a look at the valiant Knights of the past. (yeah thats us sonny haha)...those knights were driven to work through their king to help the people in most cases. Unlike popular belief that the knighthood was loyal to this and that...i mean look..the Knights would have to pledge loyalty to every single ruler...every time, and so doesn't that kindof take away from the live and die for my king bit? Loyalties changing over time?...yes. The greed of Knights...the force that had driven them to do things was not a bad greed at all.
In fact, it was what i want to call the fossil fuel of greed. And since there are probably only about 5 people left in the world who are driven to do good as the Knights were...we'll say it has burned out.
The Knights' and Honorables' [of other time periods] greed was that to do good deeds and to help or do the honorable thing. Live and die by honor and most believed heaven awaited them. They were so greedy, so driven for the good..that they could not accept less than that. Thus...Greed, that is...furthering one's personal goals...was not bad.
These days the alternatives to the Noble goals of men, and Sonny...the Greed that is stereotyped everywhere...is the terrible kind. The alternative to our old fuels are the kind that drive the world faster, meaner, and sound scarier. The goals of most people these days are the kind that are not noble at all.
This might be why i only call sonny a fellow Knight. It may be why the masters of ninjiutsu are just 2 old men..and a young fellow. Honorable ways are certainly past and not to come back anytime soon. You should think on what your goals are and which type of greed you embrace. I can tell ya that everything i do and say..is Just and good. Sure we all have our fun, but there is certainly a difference in taking down bad people..and hurting decent ones. Or not helping decent ones for that matter.
So which is it gang?
Are your goals...your Greed...are these aligned with decency or are you just another politician?
Do the things you seek help others?
Do they mean anything either way?
Can you be sure you play on the right side every time?
[crap...also remind me to talk about pros and cons of Good and Bad..and Grey]
Think Hard.
NS
by Nightscript on Sat 24th May 6am
Yeah seariously (as in sear the hair from your mind lol!)..its one of the things ive thought about for a very long time..so if you laugh then fuck you. If you read on then thats cool maybe you can add a means to the method.
First off, i'm not a crackpot..im not crazy...an aylum would be cool but i dont need it. I think..and i think well. So here we go..down the magic creature hole to see how shallow it may or may not be...and yes i did just do that, totally changed the things.
Like i said, here we go..
Time is certainly not circular or cylindrical or whatever they say that it is. Time does not repeat itself at all...no matter how much you think it does. But why sir, do we think that it is a circular thing? i know that just went through your head..either that or nothingness....hm, probably the latter..anyways we think it is circular and thus repetitive because we look for it to be and call it every time something might be similar. The movie 'The Number 23' is a perfect example...this movie is about coincidence with a number and a fictional tale about a man who sees the number and is wrapped up in his own life's book's story. if that makes sense we will continue, if not stop reading and go outside to play. People who have watched that movie find themselves seeing the number 23 a little more often and some freak out...but why? its because they are subconciously on the lookout for that one single number. This is why we think history repeats itself...because we constantly watch and record things that are similar to previous events...the world wars are a good example here..we think that because someone started wwI, and then another person started wwII that there will be another one...why? Because of the similarities within each of the first two..so let look from a different angle...in fact a more simple angle...wars happen. people ask for help...countries get involved. Nothing more.
Now we have established that time is singular and straighforward..but what in the name of your gods does that have to do with shifting time? changing your location in the fourth dimension? Well, had time been circular then it wouldnt be possible to travel in days or years, but more likely to the most recent occurrence of the repetitive event. Circularity refers to forgetting the point a once we pass over it a second time and call it point b...basically we erase the past event with the last thing that was similar to it. like this: dynasty wars of asia have been forgotten because there have been other wars like WW1 in its place.
So there is why again that time is straight. if we had a method of controlling the fourth dimension..which for people who dont really know, its time...but a way to control it is beyond me..thats not why im here writing, im going to tell you now, the method to do so.
Here comes the crazy part.
Time is flowing. Every part of it flows forward, kindof like a waterfall, its always going to run, no matter what it will run, never stopping because, i dunno lets say maybe a small amount of pressure would build up behind if it didnt...enough pressure, mind you, to make it go eventually. So the present flows forward, the now...it continues forward and presses against what is the future...thus forcing the future forward as well. The past does the same thing, it too flows forward, only it presses against the present...the system is kindof perpetual you see? We continue to exist because of the past essentially. without the past's pressure, the persent wouldn't press against the future and there wouldnt be a future...theoretically. And though there is a minor detail of when time had to have started that all three would have been in the same location at the same time..haha. So yes something had to set them in motion..but forget that, it isnt the point. Now we have established that Time is not cylindrical but straight on, and also that it flows...all three aspects of it flow.
So how could we manage to somehow alter where we are in all of this? No matter where YOU are, its going to be the present. keep that in Mind. The present is what we see, experience, and all of that. To us, it dictates the future and creates the past. So let's form something that will take us into one of the other aspects. If we wanted to visit the future, supposing that our future might be predetermined based on our actions or 'path' in the present, we would have to have a method of shifting ourselves. I'm not providing that, im only giving my thoery of how to go about doing it.
So lets take a trip...right?
In order to make ourselves be in another part of the fourth dimension...theoretically, we wouldnt actually travel there. We would have to make that aspect the present...because we are always in the present right? So forget all ideas of machines sending people and stuff back in time or forward...Forget it. Think instead of something that alters time in a way to make it come to us. Humans are a stubborn sort right? so why dare to chase after something? exactly..
So the point of this big long thing you might have read.
We change time itself, not ourselves in time. In order to see the past we would have to commit something like this: Slowing our own present time in order to allow the flow of the past to catch up and wash over the present. We would stay at our seemingly slowed pace until the time desired was reached. this way people can coordinate themselves better, they would know their exact location upon 'arrival' and be able to work more efficiently. Of course this sort of thing would have to be controlled somehow, it wouldnt be humane to create something that would affect the entire fourth dimension...just something localized and semi small...
We change time itself, not ourselves in time. If we wanted to go ahead in time, which would follow the future of the path we were on at the normal present, and yes that means we wouldnt make any choices that could chage it while 'in transit'..we would be in a future that might possibly be the exact same as the normal present...with some time added. But the theoretical methodology is the same for the past. Only this time we would want to speed up the normal present a little...so that the normal present would overcome the future and wash over it like the past would have, going the other direction. Then once the desired time was reached we would return to normal and thus the future we desired becomes the new present...just like the past trip we took a moment ago yea?
so thats all there is.
We wanna slow the present so the past can catch up.
We wanna speed the present so that is can catch the future.
Thats all there is to my theory of time travel, maybe next time we will have a means to the method...
Adieu,
|
|
|
|
 |
About Me |
| n: | Nightscript (Skyler West) | | l: | I am inside my Mind. | | o: | Cook/Teacher/Advisor | | View my Profile |
|
|
 |
Recent Blogs |
|
|
 |
Link To Me |
|
|
|
 |